By MyInfowars
The National Endowment for Democracy is a well known US -CIA funded NGO that is used by the American Government to destabilise any nations they deem unfriendly through engineered popular uprising that is typically rallied around the calls for more democracy or charges of human rights violations.
They are know to have played an active role in the Arab Spring series of street riots and demonstrations that led to the toppling of several Governments in the region.
According to this Wikipedia entry, the NED is fully funded by the US Government as forms part of their USAID overseas aid campaign, which is known as America's way of buying influence throughout the world.
Even Americans are starting to realise the real danger that the current US policy of using the NED to create unrest in faraway lands creates.
Inciting riots in faraway lands only creates hatred among the local population against America and this brings harm to the American people who have nothing to do with the vile policies of their Government. Of course many will argue that in a democracy, the people are ultimately responsible for the actions of their servants, ie the Government.
In this article, the links between the rioting and street demonstrations in Russia are now being linked to the NED, this takes things to a new level as Russia is a genuine military threat to the United States and has the capability to deliver nuclear strike to the heart of the USA.
Below is an excerpt from the article
While the West busy themselves with running down incoming Russian president Vladimir Putin, many are wondering what strategy the Kremlin has in place to counter this underhanded tactic.
As we can see from the article, the NED is well known for funding opposition politicians in many countries as it gives them a veneer of respectability and, more importantly, deniablity but they apply this ruse so dogmatically that they do not even bother to hide it from the public.
Unsurprisingly, the Malaysian Opposition have been vocal in calling for street demonstrations in the name of democracy to be sparked in this country, not realising that they may be part of a bigger American agenda to create an atmosphere of general instability within the world in order to allow Pax-Americana to prevail.
The NED's approach is a more hamfisted way of achieving the divide and conquer rule that became popular as the method of choice for ruling the British Empire and it remains to be one of the cornerstone of English foreign relations policy.
The extent of the danger that the NED poses to the United States and the world as a whole can be seen from this entry at AntiWar,Com
With calls for street demonstrations rising to a crescendo in Malaysia, we have to be careful not to become mere tools of the Americans as they incite instability in South-East Asia as a way of keeping China's southern borders unsafe.
We have to remember that US President Barack Obama, which is widely recognised as a puppet of the globalists and international bankers have made it clear that he wants Uncle Sam to be dominant in the South East Asian region and will enhance their military presence by placing troops in Australia to add to their presence in the Philippines and Singapore.
America, or rather the international bankers and globalists that control the US Goverhment, are focusing their efforts on emerging super economies as part of their ongoing global economic war.
Russia and China are the easiest to attach as they have been painted as the bogeyman during the Cold War era. There are already efforts taken against Brazil with India still being spared of any unusual activities but America has Kashmir and the instability in Pakistan and Afghanistan which they can ratchet up rather quickly to make India nervous.
2012 may not mark the end of the world but it may mark the end of the world as we know it, with so many national and political turbulence causing disruptions in the lives of countless countries.
We may see the birth pains of a New World Order that many Western leaders have alluded to for the better part of the last three decades.
 |
| The President of the National Endowment for Democracy, Carl Gershman (pictured, second from the left), presents an award to a Tunisian leader of the Arab Spring in November 2011. |
The National Endowment for Democracy is a well known US -CIA funded NGO that is used by the American Government to destabilise any nations they deem unfriendly through engineered popular uprising that is typically rallied around the calls for more democracy or charges of human rights violations.
They are know to have played an active role in the Arab Spring series of street riots and demonstrations that led to the toppling of several Governments in the region.
According to this Wikipedia entry, the NED is fully funded by the US Government as forms part of their USAID overseas aid campaign, which is known as America's way of buying influence throughout the world.
Even Americans are starting to realise the real danger that the current US policy of using the NED to create unrest in faraway lands creates.
Inciting riots in faraway lands only creates hatred among the local population against America and this brings harm to the American people who have nothing to do with the vile policies of their Government. Of course many will argue that in a democracy, the people are ultimately responsible for the actions of their servants, ie the Government.
In this article, the links between the rioting and street demonstrations in Russia are now being linked to the NED, this takes things to a new level as Russia is a genuine military threat to the United States and has the capability to deliver nuclear strike to the heart of the USA.
Below is an excerpt from the article
As the evidence begins to mount pointing the accusing finger at the increasingly illegitimate corporate-financier occupiers of the West’s governments as having built up Russian opposition movements and being behind the current unrest filling Russia’s streets, the corporate media has already started to rewrite events as they unfold.
An amazing piece of mid-event revisionism titled, “Moscow braces as election protest goes viral,” desperately attempts to portray the protests as “leaderless” even as the article itself interviews “organizers.” Quoting unnamed, and most likely nonexistent protesters, the article featured in the Sydney Morning Herald insists protesters claimed, “I came on my own. I learnt about it on the web.”
But the article then states (emphasis added), “and last night, thanks to the web, organisers were expecting more than 30,000 people to demonstrate against what they see as the rigged results of last Sunday’s elections, because that’s how many have committed themselves to a sign-up sheet on Facebook.”
While the article claims that no political party is recruiting protesters, earlier reports out of the Western media contradict this entirely, with the London Telegraph reproducing a blog post by US NED-funded opposition leader Boris Nemtsov stating before the December 10 protests, “I am talking about pickets at Petrovka 38 (the main police station) and on Simferopol Boulevard where the detained are being held, and other actions too. We start from today. I will take part in all this myself. On Saturday, December 10, a general meeting will be held on Revolution Square (in Moscow) at two o’clock to protest against these false elections.
While the West busy themselves with running down incoming Russian president Vladimir Putin, many are wondering what strategy the Kremlin has in place to counter this underhanded tactic.
As we can see from the article, the NED is well known for funding opposition politicians in many countries as it gives them a veneer of respectability and, more importantly, deniablity but they apply this ruse so dogmatically that they do not even bother to hide it from the public.
 |
| In this picture, Malaysian Opposition leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is photographed as part of the NED board, cementing his link with this insidious American organisation |
The NED's approach is a more hamfisted way of achieving the divide and conquer rule that became popular as the method of choice for ruling the British Empire and it remains to be one of the cornerstone of English foreign relations policy.
The extent of the danger that the NED poses to the United States and the world as a whole can be seen from this entry at AntiWar,Com
The misnamed National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is nothing more than a costly program that takes US taxpayer funds to promote favored politicians and political parties abroad.
What the NED does in foreign countries, through its recipient organizations the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican Institute (IRI), would be rightly illegal in the United States.
The NED injects "soft money" into the domestic elections of foreign countries in favor of one party or the other. Imagine what a couple of hundred thousand dollars will do to assist a politician or political party in a relatively poor country abroad. It is particularly Orwellian to call US manipulation of foreign elections "promoting democracy." How would Americans feel if the Chinese arrived with millions of dollars to support certain candidates deemed friendly to China? Would this be viewed as a democratic development?
In an excellent study of the folly of the National Endowment for Democracy, Barbara Conry notes that:
"NED, which also has a history of corruption and financial mismanagement, is superfluous at best and often destructive. Through the endowment, the American taxpayer has paid for special-interest groups to harass the duly elected governments of friendly countries, interfere in foreign elections, and foster the corruption of democratic movements...
"...the controversy surrounding NED questions the wisdom of giving a quasi-private organization the fiat to pursue what is effectively an independent foreign policy under the guise of 'promoting democracy.' Proponents of NED maintain that a private organization is necessary to overcome the restraints that limit the activities of a government agency, yet they insist that the American taxpayer provide full funding for this initiative. NED's detractors point to the inherent contradiction of a publicly funded organization that is charged with executing foreign policy (a power expressly given to the federal government in the Constitution) yet exempt from nearly all political and administrative controls.
With calls for street demonstrations rising to a crescendo in Malaysia, we have to be careful not to become mere tools of the Americans as they incite instability in South-East Asia as a way of keeping China's southern borders unsafe.
We have to remember that US President Barack Obama, which is widely recognised as a puppet of the globalists and international bankers have made it clear that he wants Uncle Sam to be dominant in the South East Asian region and will enhance their military presence by placing troops in Australia to add to their presence in the Philippines and Singapore.
America, or rather the international bankers and globalists that control the US Goverhment, are focusing their efforts on emerging super economies as part of their ongoing global economic war.
Russia and China are the easiest to attach as they have been painted as the bogeyman during the Cold War era. There are already efforts taken against Brazil with India still being spared of any unusual activities but America has Kashmir and the instability in Pakistan and Afghanistan which they can ratchet up rather quickly to make India nervous.
2012 may not mark the end of the world but it may mark the end of the world as we know it, with so many national and political turbulence causing disruptions in the lives of countless countries.
We may see the birth pains of a New World Order that many Western leaders have alluded to for the better part of the last three decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment